- ホーム
- Apps
- Specialized Solutions
- Grant Management for Odoo
イメージプレビューRun funded programs inside Odoo:
register awards and agreements, hold grant budgets against actuals, track drawdowns and disbursements, and produce funder report packs on demand. Built to order by ECOSIRE for Odoo 17.0, 18.0 and 19.0.
Grant Management for Odooとは?
Run funded programs inside Odoo: register awards and agreements, hold grant budgets against actuals, track drawdowns and disbursements, and produce funder report packs on demand. Built to order by ECOSIRE for Odoo 17.0, 18.0 and 19.0. Built to order by ECOSIRE for Odoo 17, 18, 19 — indicative price from $999.00 USD; request a quote for a scoped proposal.
主な機能
受注生産、すべておまかせ
自分での設定は不要 — ECOSIRE が構築・インストール・サポートする実働アプリです。
- 1
ご注文
一回限りの構築料金から始めます。キックオフで一緒に範囲を決めます。
- 2
構築とインストール
ECOSIRE がお客様の Odoo 上で構築・設定・インストールします。
- 3
本番稼働 + サポート
約1週間(営業日ベース)で稼働し、本番稼働後2週間のサポートが付きます。納品したコードの不具合は無償で修正します。
技術仕様
- Odoo互換性
- Odoo 17, Odoo 18, Odoo 19
- エディション
- Enterprise&Community
- ライセンス
- ライセンスの確認が必要です
- Python要件
- Python 3.10+
- データベース
- PostgreSQL 12+
この製品について
Grant-funded organisations lose money and reputation in the gap between the award letter and the acquittal. The award terms live in a PDF on someone's drive, the budget lives in a spreadsheet, the actual spend lives in Odoo journal entries, and the funder report is assembled by hand every quarter by an overworked finance officer who has to remember that this funder allows 12% indirect costs but that one caps them at 8%. Odoo out of the box has no concept of a grant. analytic.account and analytic.plan will carry cost allocation, and crm.lead will track the application pipeline, but neither knows about an award ceiling, a milestone-linked drawdown, an eligible-cost rule, a reporting calendar, or an acquittal deadline. The moment a program is funded by two grants with different eligibility windows, the spreadsheet becomes the system of record and the ERP becomes a bookkeeping afterthought.
We build a grant model that sits properly inside the Odoo accounting and analytic stack rather than beside it. A new ecosire.grant model (models.Model) holds the award: funder (res.partner), reference, award amount, currency, agreement start and end dates, eligibility window, indirect-cost basis and rate, and the signed agreement as an attachment with a document-state workflow. Each grant owns budget lines keyed to an analytic account and, where you want finer control, to an account group or expense category, so a compute field with @api.depends on the posted account.move.line set gives you committed, actual and remaining in real time instead of at month end. Drawdown and disbursement records track what has been requested from the funder, what has been received, and what has been paid out to sub-recipients, each linked to the underlying account.move and account.payment so the cash trail is auditable rather than asserted. Timesheet lines and vendor bills allocate to grants through the analytic distribution Odoo already understands, which means salary apportionment across three funders stops being a monthly reconstruction.
The reporting layer is where funders are actually satisfied or annoyed. We build QWeb report templates for the pack each of your funders demands — expenditure by budget category against approved budget, variance with narrative fields, drawdown history, staff time allocation summary — rendered as PDF and, where the funder insists on it, exported to their spreadsheet template. A reporting calendar on each grant drives Odoo automated actions (base.automation / ir.cron) that raise activities ahead of every interim report, drawdown window and acquittal date, so the deadline surfaces in the responsible officer's inbox rather than in an auditor's finding. Overspend and eligibility-window breaches raise warnings at the point of entry, with a configurable choice between blocking and warning, because a hard block on a legitimate accrual causes more damage than it prevents.
Access control is deliberate, not an afterthought. Program managers see their own grants, finance sees all of them, and funder-facing read-only roles see the report data without the general ledger — implemented with ir.model.access.csv for model-level rights plus ir.rule record rules keyed to the responsible user and program, and multi-company rules where you run several legal entities. Everything is exposed on the standard XML-RPC and JSON-RPC API, so a grants portal, a funder data feed or your existing BI tool can read grant balances without a second database. Views are standard Odoo XML with OWL components only where the interaction genuinely needs them, which keeps the module upgradable rather than clever. The module targets Odoo 17.0, 18.0 and 19.0 and works on Community — the Enterprise-only pieces (accounting reports engine, Documents, Approvals) are used when they are present and cleanly substituted when they are not, and we tell you in scoping which side of that line each requirement falls on.
This is a build-to-order product, not a download. You request a quotation, we run a scoping call, and we come back with a fixed written scope covering your funders, your budget categories, your indirect-cost rules and your report pack layouts. On confirmed scope, typical delivery is one working week: we build against your Odoo version and edition, install on your staging database, and run UAT against your real historical grants so the numbers can be checked against what you already reported. Nothing is a template drop — the model is shared across engagements, the funder rules and report packs are yours. You receive installable source code, a git repository handover, technical and user documentation, a training session, and a post-go-live support window for defect fixes.
得られるもの
- Installable Odoo addon source code built for your exact version (17.0, 18.0 or 19.0) and edition, with a correct `__manifest__.py`, declared dependencies and no demo-data leakage
- Installation and configuration on your staging database, including funders, budget categories, indirect-cost rules and reporting calendars set up with your real data
- Technical documentation: data model and field reference, computed-field logic, security matrix (`ir.model.access.csv` + record rules), cron and automated-action inventory, and API notes
- End-user guide covering the grant lifecycle from award registration through drawdown, allocation and acquittal, written for finance and program staff
- Live training session with your finance and program team, recorded for later joiners
- UAT on staging against your historical grants, with a documented test script and an agreed rollback plan before any production install
- Post-go-live support window for defect fixes on the delivered scope, with a named channel and response expectations set in writing
- Private git repository handover with full commit history, so the code is yours and any developer can maintain it
これは誰のためのものですか
Finance Manager / Grants Accountant at a nonprofit
Owns the acquittal and the audit. Needs actual spend per grant to be a live figure from the general ledger rather than a quarterly reconstruction, and needs indirect-cost recovery calculated the same way every time so the auditor stops asking about it.
Program Manager running funded projects
Responsible for delivering within an award ceiling and eligibility window. Needs to see remaining budget by category before committing a purchase order, and needs reporting deadlines to arrive as Odoo activities rather than as surprises.
Research Office / Grants Administrator at an institute
Manages a portfolio of awards with different funder rules, overhead rates and reporting templates. Needs a single register of agreements and reporting obligations, and needs staff time apportioned across grants defensibly.
Executive Director or CFO of a funded organisation
Accountable to the board and to funders for the restricted-fund position. Needs a portfolio view of committed versus received versus spent across all awards, and confidence that no grant is quietly overspending or under-drawing.
Grant Management for Odoo の比較方法
| 基準 | エコシエール | カスタムビルド | 競合他社 | Odoo 標準機能 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fit to your funders' rules | Built to your actual award terms, eligibility windows, indirect-cost bases and report layouts, agreed in a written scope before development starts | Same potential fit, but you carry the analysis and the design decisions yourself before anyone writes code | Generic budget-vs-actual against a fixed model; funder-specific rules get worked around in spreadsheets | No grant concept at all — analytic accounts carry cost, but award ceilings, eligibility and acquittal live outside the system |
| Actual spend figures | Computed live from posted `account.move.line` via `@api.depends`, tied to your existing analytic structure | Achievable, but naive implementations snapshot totals and drift away from the ledger | Usually accurate for a simple single-grant cost centre; multi-grant split allocation is where it breaks | Analytic reports show cost by account but carry no budget ceiling or funder context |
| Drawdowns and funder cash | Request / approve / receive register linked to `account.move` and `account.payment`, plus sub-recipient disbursement and clawback | Buildable, but reconciliation back to bank and claim is the part most in-house builds skip | Rarely covered — drawdown tracking is the most common gap in off-the-shelf grant addons | Payments exist, but nothing links a receipt to a specific funder claim or award ceiling |
| Funder report packs | QWeb PDF templates plus a matching spreadsheet export per funder, driven from one dataset so the two cannot disagree | Possible, but report authoring is usually where an in-house project runs out of budget | One generic report; funder templates still get filled in by hand from an export | Standard accounting reports only — no grant budget, variance narrative or drawdown history |
| Deadlines and compliance prompts | Reporting calendar per grant driving `ir.cron` and automated actions that raise activities before every interim report and acquittal | Needs deliberate design; frequently deferred to phase two and never built | Rarely included; teams fall back on a shared calendar | Activities exist as a framework, but nothing knows a grant deadline to raise one from |
| Access control | Program-scoped record rules, finance-wide access and a funder-facing read-only role via `ir.model.access.csv` + `ir.rule`, multi-company aware | Depends entirely on the developer's discipline; record rules are commonly under-specified | Typically model-level groups only, so every user sees every grant | Standard accounting groups — no notion of who owns which award |
| Upgradability and ownership | Standard addon structure with a versioned `__manifest__.py` per series; source code and git repository handed to you | You own it, but the maintenance load and bus-factor sit with whoever wrote it | Vendor controls the roadmap and version support; licence-locked or obfuscated code is common | Upgrades cleanly because there is nothing there to upgrade |
| Delivery and accountability | Fixed written scope, one working week from confirmation, staging UAT against your historical grants, rollback plan and a post-go-live support window | Timeline and cost depend on internal capacity; scope creep is the usual failure mode | Instant install, but the gap between what it does and what your funder requires becomes your project anyway | Available immediately and at no cost — and immediately insufficient for funded programs |
Grant Management に関するよくある質問
How long does delivery take?
This is a build-to-order module, not an existing apps.odoo.com download. After you request a quotation we run a scoping call and issue a fixed written scope. From confirmed scope, typical delivery is one working week, including build, staging install and UAT against your real historical grants. Scope with several funder-specific report packs or unusual indirect-cost rules sits at the longer end, and we tell you that before you commit.
What support and updates do I get after go-live?
Delivery includes a post-go-live support window for defect fixes on the delivered scope, with a named channel and agreed response expectations. Beyond that window we offer an ongoing support and maintenance agreement covering fixes, minor enhancements and version upgrades. Because you receive the source code and a git repository, you are never locked in — your own developers or another partner can maintain it if you prefer.
Does this work on Odoo Community, or do I need Enterprise?
It works on Community. The grant model, budgets, drawdowns, allocation, security and QWeb report packs use standard Odoo framework features present in both editions. Where Enterprise features exist in your database — the accounting reports engine, Documents, Approvals — we integrate with them; where they do not, we deliver a clean substitute. Each of these is identified during scoping so there is no surprise at UAT.
Which Odoo versions are supported?
We build for Odoo 17.0, 18.0 and 19.0. The module is packaged per series, so you receive a branch matching the version you actually run rather than one build full of version guards. If you are planning a version upgrade, say so in scoping and we will scope the upgrade path at the same time.
Will this conflict with our existing accounting or analytic setup?
It is designed to sit on top of what you already have rather than replace it. Grants attach to your existing analytic accounts and plans, and actuals are read from posted `account.move.line` records — we do not create a parallel ledger. If your analytic structure needs adjusting to support grant reporting, we identify that during scoping and include the migration in the delivered work rather than leaving it to you.
Can our funders or an external portal read grant data?
Yes. Everything is exposed through Odoo's standard XML-RPC and JSON-RPC API, and we can provide a funder-facing read-only role scoped by record rules so an external consumer sees grant balances and report data without access to the general ledger. A public portal or a scheduled data feed to a funder system is scoped as an extension of this build.
What happens if a funder changes its report format next year?
Report packs are QWeb templates and export mappings, not hardcoded logic, so a layout change is a template edit against the same dataset. You hold the source and the git repository, so your team can make routine changes directly. Larger changes — a new eligibility rule, a different indirect-cost basis — are a small change request under a support agreement or a fixed quote.
関連モジュール

Guest House Management for Odoo
A build-to-order Odoo module that turns Odoo into a working property system for small and mid-size guest houses — room inventory, reservations, folios, housekeeping and check-in/out. ECOSIRE scopes, builds, installs and supports it; it is not an off-the-shelf download.
Grant Management
Run funded programs inside Odoo: register awards and agreements, hold grant budgets against actuals, track drawdowns and disbursements, and produce funder report packs on demand. Built to order by ECOSIRE for Odoo 17.0, 18.0 and 19.0.
- Dedicated `ecosire.grant` model holding funder, award reference, ceiling amount, currency, agreement period, eligibility window and signed-agreement attachment, with a state workflow from application through active to acquitted
- Grant budget lines keyed to analytic accounts and account groups, with computed committed / actual / remaining amounts via `@api.depends` on posted `account.move.line` records rather than periodic snapshots
- Drawdown register: requested, approved and received amounts per claim, each linked to the originating `account.move` and receipting `account.payment`, so cash is reconciled to the funder claim and not just to the bank
- Disbursement tracking for sub-recipients and partner organisations, including retention of unspent balances and clawback entries


